Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Liebman Quote on Innovators

  1. #21
    Inactive Member dr-funkenstein's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 14th, 2002
    Posts
    151
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    "In fact, near virtuosity is mandatory. Every succeeding generation throws down the gauntlet as far as raising the bar in this way. What was innovative and new becomes standard and required. In the past few decades since Coltrane the level of proficiency on the instrument has risen dramatically. Now everybody is a speed demon. If you look at the true innovators, the first observable level is often technical. In general, the innovators definitely raised the technical level on their instruments. Louis Armstrong, Bird and Coltrane all did that for sure. Alongside this contribution, they added something musically, not to mention spiritually which became transferable to all instruments and the music itself. That is true innovation."

    [/QUOTE]

    DL was relating technique to the natural progression of generations of music/musicians- not as much to indivdual players.

    when he pointed out individuals, he was saying their true innovation was in fact NOT AS MUCH technical as it was the larger impact of their musical/spiritual expression which would effect music . . . not just the evolution of instrumental technique.

    technical evolution is a given- that "thing" that makes someone innovative is what DL is alluding to, not comments on the (obvious) importance of technique.

    to question whether tony was an innovator but to accept mike clark as a defacto innovator is odd to me.

    ALL the dudes we talk about on this board do SOMETHING innovative-

  2. #22
    Inactive Member Henry II's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 6th, 2005
    Posts
    696
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Originally posted by Jonathan599:
    No doubt he was a musical innovator. But how did he raise the bar technically? I thought he served as a fair counterexample to Lieb's generalization. Please explain.

    <font color="#a62a2a"><font size="1">[ July 21, 2005 12:40 PM: Message edited by: Jonathan599 ]</font></font>

    <font color="#a62a2a"><font size="1">[ July 21, 2005 12:43 PM: Message edited by: Jonathan599 ]</font></font>
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Jack DeJohnette has a ton of chops. But, I don't know if it is fair to say that he raised the level of technique on his instrument. Perhaps his bass foot independence and phrasing was raised to a new level when he first did that kind of thing.

    Yet, he is definitely a musical innovator. I credit JD with fusing rock/funk snare and bass drum phrasing/interaction with swingtime in a way no one did before. And that innovation is related to the technical aspects of JD's playing that separated him from his contemporaries.

    So, to that extent, Liebman is right.

    <font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ July 24, 2005 05:48 PM: Message edited by: Henry II ]</font>

  3. #23
    Inactive Member Henry II's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 6th, 2005
    Posts
    696
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Originally posted by Flarobstix:
    I personally don't think of chops and technique, as simply speed. I include touch and sound. Jack has tons of speed. His approach is unorthadox, but technically, he's a master like anyone else. He simply has his own take on it.
    After having seen Jack play up close dozens of time, I feel that you can't play drums the way he does unless you have amazing technical ability. To get his sound, and phrase the way he does, you need chops. It's just that his usage is so perfect and so musical that your mind doesn't go there. Watch him next time. It's pretty sick.
    I think of ocean waves when I hear Jack.
    Also, please tell me how Tony Williams raised the bar technically.
    Do you really think everything he played was technically original? Not in my opinion. People in the middle east were playing groupings before Tony was born. People in this country were swingin' and playing rudiments at lightning speed before he was born. What was so original about Tony?? In my opinion, his approach. He didn't have more chops than Buddy or Philly, and technically didn't play anything more difficult. To me it was unorthadox musicality. His drop outs, his phrasing, his sound, his ride cymbal playing. Not his hands or feet.
    The reality is that music is what it's all about. These people make amazing music. 2% of all professional drummers are actually musical in my opinion. If it weren't for clinic tours, 50% of the big name choppers would be out of work. It's about the music. Drummers that work in a high level ensemble setting everyday of their lives are the real drummers for me.
    When was the last time you Bill Stewart in clinic?

    <font color="#a62a2a"><font size="1">[ July 21, 2005 01:02 PM: Message edited by: Flarobstix ]</font></font>

    <font color="#a62a2a"><font size="1">[ July 21, 2005 01:04 PM: Message edited by: Flarobstix ]</font></font>
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I've seen Jack DeJohnette in a clinic.

  4. #24
    Inactive Member dr-funkenstein's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 14th, 2002
    Posts
    151
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    JD has chops to spare. he is piano player and thinks VERY musically. sometimes finesse players dont get credit for their chops. in jacks case, they are formidable.

    i am still working on my inverted cheese-cha-chudda raddamadoodle off the left.

  5. #25
    Inactive Member blake1's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 1st, 2001
    Posts
    408
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I'm not sure if the Liebman quote is his philosophy, We've played together, and at that time, he had a different view of the matter.

    Got to be careful with pinning one's words to their philosophy. Words only go so far.

    Miles and Monk. They created music based on how they could play the instrument. They were innovators of music and also their instruments.

    Much music and great music at that can be created with little technique. Look at how much the Blues artists can milk a 12 bar blues.


    The Shaggs and Alan Holdworth are both valid in my book. Love them both...

  6. #26
    Inactive Member got_a_matchgrip's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 5th, 2005
    Posts
    1,335
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Wink

    What'd you [dsop] say? /;-p

    [Ah...nevermind. Word.]

    <font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ July 24, 2005 12:47 PM: Message edited by: got_a_match_grip? ]</font>

  7. #27
    Inactive Member PocketPlayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 20th, 2002
    Posts
    1,462
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    "If you make a mistake while playing, immediately repeat the mistake...they'll call you one of the great innovators of our time."

    Stewart Copeland
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">My philosophy ever since I played my first Live gig!

  8. #28
    Inactive Member got_a_matchgrip's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 5th, 2005
    Posts
    1,335
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I personally don't think of chops and technique, as simply speed. I include touch and sound...
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I agree. & perhaps more [my earlier post].
    Much music and great music at that can be created with little technique
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I agree w that AW [w/out going into the various definitions of the idea of "technique" - tho even the simplest forms of music also involve some sort of "technq"...i took that to be meant "more notes or groupgs, or busier, etc"... /;-)]. [img]cool.gif[/img]

    It "runs the gamut."

    <font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ July 26, 2005 02:21 PM: Message edited by: got_a_match_grip? ]</font>

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •